20
Oct
2026
The Hague: Court President expresses judicial solidarity with the International Criminal Court
On 15 October 2026, the President of the Court, Mattias Guyomar, visited the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, where he met with its President, Judge Tomoko Akane. The meeting provided an opportunity for President Guyomar to express in person and on behalf of the Court judicial solidarity with the ICC at a time when it has been subject to sanction as an institution, and certain judges and prosecutors have been designated.
President Guyomar stressed the importance of standing with judges who face attacks and pressure because of their judicial work.
The President underlined that such attacks strike at the very foundations of the international legal order adding that peace should be defended through law and justice.
Forthcoming delivery of advisory opinion
Forthcoming delivery of an advisory opinion in response to a request from the Constitutional Court of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
The ECHR will deliver an advisory opinion at a public hearing on Tuesday 20 October 2026.
The delivery will be broadcast live on the European Court’s YouTube channel.
The request was made in the context of disciplinary proceedings brought against a former lawyer of the Luxembourg Bar who was disbarred for life by the Disciplinary and Administrative Board of Appeal. Having failed to appear in person before the disciplinary bodies, as required by section 26(11) of the Law of 10 August 1991, the Board of Appeal found against her by default and her counsel was refused leave to represent her in her absence.
A delegation of the Court of Justice of the European Union visits the Court
On 12 October 2026, a delegation from the Court of Justice of the EU, led by its President Koen Lenaerts, paid a visit to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg for the two courts’ regular annual bilateral meeting.
This year’s discussions focused on the respective contributions of each court to the protection of fundamental rights and the rule of law across Europe, with particular attention to the independence of the judiciary, the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms in the area of sport, and the role of values in the Convention system and the EU system of fundamental rights protection.
On the sidelines of the visit, President Mattias Guyomar and President Koen Lenaerts gave a joint interview titled Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow: A dialogue between two Court Presidents. The interview centered on the distinct yet complementary roles of the two jurisdictions in shaping and safeguarding the European legal space, the concrete impact of their case-law on the daily lives of people across Europe, including young people, and the challenges facing both courts. The interview will be published on the websites and social media channels of the two courts.
Italy: the President takes part in an event with the Venice Commission and gives a speech at the University of Padua
From 8 to 9 October 2026, Mattias Guyomar, the President of the Court, Gilberto Felici, the judge elected in respect of San Marino and Abel Campos, Deputy Registrar of the Court, visited Italy.
While there, they participated in a conference held at the University of Padua entitled The ECHR from the inside: the experience of the Judges and the Registry and took part in an exchange of views with the Venice Commission, chaired by Marta Cartabia, on the subject of access to justice. The President also delivered an address, as guest of honour, at the opening of the 148th Plenary Session of the Venice Commission.
In that address, on 9 October, the President emphasised that exchanges between the two institutions enriched their respective work and fostered a process of “cross-fertilisation”.
“While the Venice Commission and the Court each have their own role and place, they share a common mission: to ensure that democracy, the rule of law and human rights are practical, effective and dynamic principles that benefit all. Our actions are complementary and guided by our shared values,” the President stated.
On 8 October, he also took part in the Crossed Perspectives on Access to Justice: Dialogue between the President of the European Court of Human Rights and the Venice Commission event in Venice, during which he highlighted the Court’s recent case-law that illustrated each of the criteria in the Venice Commission’s 2025 Updated Rule of Law Checklist.
During the same event, the Deputy Registrar delivered opening remarks, and Judge Felici spoke about the issue of the protection of lawyers and the relationship between lawyers and judges.
On the morning of 8 October, at the The ECHR from the inside: the experience of the Judges and the Registry conference at the University of Padua, the President, Judge Felici and the Deputy Registrar addressed the following topics, respectively: the way in which the Court applies and interprets the Convention in the light of present-day conditions in accordance with the living-instrument doctrine, the role of the national judge at the Court, and the cooperation between judges and the Registry in the processing of applications.
The Hague: Court President expresses judicial solidarity with the International Criminal Court
On 15 October 2026, the President of the Court, Mattias Guyomar, visited the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, where he met with its President, Judge Tomoko Akane. The meeting provided an opportunity for President Guyomar to express in person and on behalf of the Court judicial solidarity with the ICC at a time when it has been subject to sanction as an institution, and certain judges and prosecutors have been designated.
President Guyomar stressed the importance of standing with judges who face attacks and pressure because of their judicial work.
The President underlined that such attacks strike at the very foundations of the international legal order adding that peace should be defended through law and justice.
Forthcoming delivery of advisory opinion
Forthcoming delivery of an advisory opinion in response to a request from the Constitutional Court of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
The ECHR will deliver an advisory opinion at a public hearing on Tuesday 20 October 2026.
The delivery will be broadcast live on the European Court’s YouTube channel.
The request was made in the context of disciplinary proceedings brought against a former lawyer of the Luxembourg Bar who was disbarred for life by the Disciplinary and Administrative Board of Appeal. Having failed to appear in person before the disciplinary bodies, as required by section 26(11) of the Law of 10 August 1991, the Board of Appeal found against her by default and her counsel was refused leave to represent her in her absence.
Judicial activities
15/10/26
Measures under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court are decided in connection with proceedings before the Court, without prejudging any subsequent decisions on the admissibility or merits of the case.
15/10/26
Civil compensation remedy effective for inadequate detention conditions
In the case of Zakutniy and Others v. Ukraine, the ECHR held that there had been no violation of the right to an effective remedy.
The case concerned the effectiveness of the compensatory remedy available under national law in respect of complaints concerning inadequate conditions of detention.
The Court found that, despite certain shortcomings, a civil claim for compensation brought under Articles 1173 and 1174 of the Civil Code could, in principle, be regarded as effective. Accordingly, where a complaint regarding inadequate conditions of detention was made, applicants were expected to make use of that legal avenue before lodging their complaints with the Court.
- Press release
- Press release (in Ukrainian)
15/10/26
The ECHR has decided to discontinue the advisory-opinion proceedings that it had begun in response to a request from Slovenia’s Supreme Court.
The advisory opinion had been sought in the context of judicial review (administrative‑dispute) proceedings pending before Slovenia’s Supreme Court following an appeal on points of law. At issue in the case was the question of whether allowing the issuance of a building permit and the construction of a motorway without first expropriating the affected land constituted an unjustified interference with the landowners’ property rights, as protected by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and Article 33 of the Constitution of Slovenia.
In June 2026, the parties reached a settlement, and the plaintiffs sought to withdraw their appeal on points of law. Normally, under Slovenian law, that would take effect automatically. However, because the proceedings had been stayed pending receipt of the advisory opinion, no procedural steps could be taken. The plaintiffs therefore asked the Supreme Court to resume the proceedings so that the withdrawal could take effect.
15/10/26
European Court accepts advisory opinion request from the Supreme Court of the Netherlands concerning review mechanism of a final acquittal for murder.
The ECHR has accepted a request for an advisory opinion submitted by the Supreme Court of the Netherlands.
The request concerns legislation which entered into force in the Netherlands in 2013 making it possible to seek review of an acquittal which had become final, to the detriment of a former defendant.
In 2025 the Board of Procurators General filed an application for review of a former defendant’s acquittal of murder, based on the results of DNA analysis obtained through techniques not available at the time of his trial. The application for review seeks to have the relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which have been amended and have entered into force since the former defendant’s acquittal in 2012, applied retroactively.
08/10/26
Disappearance of Estelle Mouzin: ECHR finds that French courts acknowledged deficiencies in justice system and compensated for resulting non-pecuniary damage.
The Court has declared inadmissible the application in the case of Mouzin v. France.
The case concerned the judicial investigation and proceedings in relation to the disappearance of the applicant’s 9-year-old daughter. Her body was never found. The Court’s decision was based both on the criminal conviction of Ms Olivier in 2023 and 2024 and on a 2025 judgment acknowledging the State’s gross negligence as a result of the defective operation of the public justice system.
Press releases on other judgments and decisions
13/10/26
13 October: 8 Judgments
8 October: 29 Judgments & 70 Decisions
Transparency and outreach
On the agenda
Videos
