Judicial activities


Responsive Image
26/10/26

On 2 November 2026 a panel of five judges will examine twelve Grand Chamber referral requests.

Human Rights building
22/10/26

Measures under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court are decided in connection with proceedings before the Court, without prejudging any subsequent decisions on the admissibility or merits of the case.

Human Rights building rear entrance
22/10/26

Court of Cassation did not lack impartiality in Silvio Berlusconi’s conviction proceedings.

 

In the case of Berlusconi v. Italy the Court held that there had been no violation of the right to a fair trial in respect of the complaint that the Court of Cassation had lacked impartiality.

The case concerned the applicant’s complaint of unfairness regarding his criminal conviction for a tax evasion scheme implemented through Mediaset S.p.A. and other companies in the same group, in connection with the purchase of television rights.

The Court found that the applicant had not shown that the bench of the Court of Cassation dealing with his case, and in particular the President of the Division to which the case had been allocated, had lacked impartiality.

Human Rights building
22/10/26

Incomplete enforcement of domestic judgments favouring applicant judges did not violate Convention.

 

The Court has declared inadmissible the applications in the case of Puşcaşu and Others v. Romania as being manifestly ill-founded.

The case concerned the failure to fully enforce court decisions ordering the Romanian State to pay the applicants, all judges or former judges, various sums of money as compensation for pay practices that had been found to be discriminatory in comparison with other categories of judges, prosecutors and civil servants.

Main hearing room of the Human Rights building
15/10/26

Civil compensation remedy effective for inadequate detention conditions

 

In the case of Zakutniy and Others v. Ukraine, the ECHR held that there had been no violation of the right to an effective remedy.

The case concerned the effectiveness of the compensatory remedy available under national law in respect of complaints concerning inadequate conditions of detention.

The Court found that, despite certain shortcomings, a civil claim for compensation brought under Articles 1173 and 1174 of the Civil Code could, in principle, be regarded as effective. Accordingly, where a complaint regarding inadequate conditions of detention was made, applicants were expected to make use of that legal avenue before lodging their complaints with the Court.

Responsive Image

Press releases on other judgments and decisions

22/10/26

22 October: 26 Judgments & 46 Decisions

20 October: 7 Judgments

Transparency and outreach


On the agenda


Videos


Responsive Image